Friday, June 12, 2026

Jennifer Hudson & Josh Groban

 What i wrote by 9:15 pm before Josh came on stage


I vowed never to go to another Josh Groban arena concert because they were too loud and hurt my ears and I felt that wearing ear plugs to a concert sorry of defeats the purpose; however, I got a new pair of concert ear plugs that are supposed to preserve the sound quality, which I wanted to try out. 


I think they worked well, because I felt like could hear without pain. 


 I got here late, but still got to hear a fair amount of Jennifer Hudson. She is a fantastic singer. She was loud, but my ear plugs made me OK with it. I got a few brief recordings, but didn’t try to record the whole thing. I missed her lowest notes and also some of her high, quiet melisma. Curiously, at one point she lowered her mic and I could still hear her and I’m clear across the arena at the far end. 


I got a good seat in section 102, having waited until the night before, when someone got desperate


The best seats on the floor seem to be pretty much sold out. The other sections have quite a few empty seats


I think one goal of this pairing was to get a broader base of fans. I did see some black people, who are normally not present at Josh Groban concerts—but not a huge number. 


Jennifer Hudson is supposed to have a younger fan base than Josh. I do see some younger people. I’m not sure how many of them are here for her. I also see quite a few men — less likely to be at a pure Josh Groban concert. 


Here’s a Google discussion of their fan bases


https://share.google/aimode/0YSR8aOq2wCPcMGhw


I do feel that this is a nice pairing. Josh has frequently chosen to duet with altos. Typically I cannot hear them over his voice. He sings very loudly.  They blend well. The audio engineers don’t adequately compensate. He really sounds better duetting with sopranos. Their high voices contrast more with his and are more audible. 


However no one is going to drown out Jennifer Hudson. The fan recordings I’ve heard online sound fantastic. She comes though loud and clear even though her voice is low. Also her distinctive melisma comes through. 


I hope Josh doesn’t try melisma tonight. The times I’ve had him try sounded pretty lame. I don’t think it’s a strength for him. 


I’m also hoping that being lower in the arena should make the sound better. I think the balcony tends to be louder because the sound from the speakers near the ceiling kind of gets trapped. 




Monday, April 6, 2026

werewolf romances; dragon hatchlings; and vampire kings

My latest youtube rabbit hole is listening to stories on these topics.

Here are some examples.



 


In each case, there are generally still photos with a story read out, most often by AI, which makes odd mistakes.  The stories may be written by AI as well, for all I know -- or at least partly written by AI.

The ones I've been watching most have been the werewolf romances.  These are typically Cinderella type stories.  An abused scullery maid ends up marrying a prince.

The werewolf world has some features.  

People are connected by a "mate bond" which usually happens almost instantly after they see each other.  The mate bond allows telepathic communication between the two members of the couple.  If one of them tries to break the bond, one or both of them may die -- sometimes rather quickly and dramatically.

Sometimes, if a rejected person finds someone else rather quickly, before they die, they can mate to the new person -- but that's unusual.

The werewolves seem to live in a pack for the most part.  There is a castle with lots of folks living in it.  The highest ranking are called alphas.  The next highest ranking are called betas.  Sometimes there are other greek letters.  The servants are called omegas.  So far I've never seen a male omega -- only females. 

The omegas live in poverty and are typically abused by other pack members.  The alphas are often billionaires who have elevated corporate positions in the human world.  Humans apparently never suspect that their corporate executives might be werewolves.

The alphas are also unusually large, not only in their wolf form, but also in their human forms.  They are typically well over six feet tall -- once I even read that one was 7 feet tall. 6'6" seems to be optimal.  They are muscular, with sharply defined jaws. I have not found any out of shape, nerdy alphas who are respected for their intellect or character.  

Alphas are always characterized by "predatory grace."  They are very violent and kill a lot of people who threaten them. They rule, in a totalitarian fashion, by exuding a magical alpha aura that makes other werewolves submit.

These packs often are in very cold climates.  Maybe they escape detection by living in wildernessy areas. Omegas seem to be frequently thrown out in the snow with no coat to die.  Exile from the pack typically means death, tho sometimes people find a rogue pack to join.  If the the rogue pack gets strong enough, it might actually get to be a regular pack, if I understand correctly.

The packs are often at war with each other -- though particularly large and violent alphas can unite packs.

Even though modern times are often alluded to, the whole pack structure seems very medieval -- and the women's gowns are typically Medieval too -- or at least floor length.

I don't see any stories about middle class people. There are people like archivists and treasurers referred to, but they're always minor characters.

In these packs, it is considered shameful to not be a werewolf.  If you are "wolfless," that is really low status, fit only for scurbing floors and living in tiny rooms with only a thin mattress on the floor.  You generally don't get enough food, also.

It is a grave crime to use chemical means to suppress someone else's wolf, but that seems to happen quite often to the female protagonists, at the hands of abusive pack members.  Typically, these bad guys suppress a woman's wolf either because they fear her power or because they have some other female relative who they hope will marry the handsome prince.

When the tortured Cinderella does finally shift, it often turns out that her wolf is extraordinary -- extra large, some showy color, or exceptionally powerful in some way.  

After the female mates with the alpha -- generally characterized by a brief announcement and sometimes a party, but seldom by a thoughtful, lengthy courtship or engagement -- she becomes his "luna."  Sometimes the luna is also a "queen."  She is considered an important partner for the alpha.  

The lunas do sometimes have kids -- more commonly referred to as "pups," but seldom very many.  Contraceptives are not mentioned, but one has to wonder why there aren't more pups.  Quite often it appears that the babies are born in wolf form and only shift to human later.

I'm kind of beating myself up for getting so sucked in to these stories.  They are really not PC.  The women, for the most part, only escape abuse by their family members  because the prince (aka alpha or alpha king) establishes a mate bond with them.  If they're dying from a broken mate bond, they cannot recover on their own.  They have to have a more powerful alpha fall in love with them.

Success in life for these women is entirely dependent on having a rich, muscle-bound thug fall in love with them.

Sometimes these women, after they get the prince, do good things, like make sure omegas get enough food and are not cheated out of their wages. There is sometimes reference to the lunas cleaning up administrative issues in the pack -- though life after mating is seldom examined, unless an alpha finds himself tragically widowed, after his mate dies, in which case some aspects of their lives and children are revealed.

Why am I inhaling this stuff?  I have been divorced for 20 years.  There's no musclebound giant on my horizon.  For the most part I am contented with my lot.  I'm not really looking for the kind of guy that's featured in these stories.   Yet I keep listening.


****

 The dragon hatchling stories are not, so far as a I can tell, romantic.  Either a human (usually male) finds a baby dragon and starts raising it -- or a dragon finds a baby human and starts raising it.

These dragons are space aliens -- encountered on other planets. They have cute babies who bond with humans.

The relationship between the human and the dragon is characterized as transformative -- and results in some kind of diplomatic breakthrough in space politics.

I sort of like this type of plot better from an intellectual point of view, but I'm watching substantially less of them.


I haven't watched enough of the vampire stories to be able to characterize them-- but apparently they have children with humans.

----------

6/1/26

I've watched an incredible number of werewolf videos now.  I don't know how people keep producing so many.  

Words commonly mispronounced in the werewolf videos

  • wound (injury v winding)
  • tear (cry v rip)
  • bow (weapon v human deference motion) 
  • herb -- reader doesn't seem to know the "h" should be silent



Monday, January 5, 2026

Lucifer rabbit hole

 I've gone down a YouTube rabbit hole of recaps of movies and shows.  Most recently this led me to recaps and clips from a Fox/Netflix show called Lucifer that I hadn't heard of before.

It turned out that the lead actor, Tom Elliot, is also an accomplished musician, which they worked into the show.   I found this YouTube video of his playing piano and singing 


(Turns out someone else is playing the piano)

For a long time, I wasn't very sensitive to what drew other people into particular performances.  I would look at what other people liked and scratch my head.

Here, though-- partly because I like the style of performance, but partly because I've learned a bit more about conveying emotions through performance -- I am totally blown away.

The Lucifer character is very complex.  He is famous, powerful, and supernatural -- yet also conflicted, vulnerable, insecure, hungry for love yet fearing love, wanting to overcome his background -- and dealing with a large, dysfunctional family.  It seems like a lot of the angels and demons seem to be actual siblings -- if not all of them.  Their mother is a powerful, yet troubled, spirit who possesses human bodies.

Tom Elliott is so brilliant in conveying this complex character.  He is really drawing me in.  His performance is all the more brilliant when he plays the piano and/or sings, because he maintains the character in the music.

When he sings "Creep" it gains new depth.  "I will survive" becomes an actual conversation.  

Sadly, it seems that this brilliant performer does not give concerts.  I wish he did.  I would like to go to one.

-------

Addenda 260118
























I took some screen shots of the "devil face" of Lucifer.  I note that it doesn't always look quite the same.  Apparently, in the rubric of the show, it reflects his own inner dislike of himself and his sense of guilt.  It's not an apearance foisted upon him from the outside.  It's his own projection of his feelings -- tho he doesn't at first recognize this.

The actor is so powerful conveying the complexity of this character -- his charisma, his inner torment, his vacillations between confidence in his own power and his sense of inadequacy, his reluctance to fall in love; but the drama of his emotions is hypnotizing.  

He's coming out with a new movie, soon, I think.  I'm almost afraid to watch it -- afraid that it will break the spell of this role.

The Chloe character is not gripping me as much.  I'm more curious to see what she would be like in another role.

-------

I'm wondering about the the theology of the show.  It doesn't seem to be Christian, except once when Dan crosses himself kneeling in front of God.  Christ is never mentioned.  Is this a Jewish view -- what God and the angels would be like without Christ?

Is a belief in angels & demons integral to Judaism and/or Christianity?  What about the idea of God retiring?

Somehow when I imagine the prime mover, I don't see him as an aging man who might need to retire and might have become forgetful -- like not remembering where he left his powers.  

Also what about this human vision of God and the angels.  I know the Bible says that God made men in his own image -- but somehow I've never really adopted that literally as a view of God.  To me there's something much more transcendent about the divine. 

------

Strangely, I get a sense of comfort from watching Lucifer with Chloe -- a sense of rightness about the world, rather than a scary devil.

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

Trying to find that Hammered Dulcimer Player

 Once upon a time, maybe 1982, I was still young, and in law school. 


I went from Columbia down to Greenwich Village with a friend. This is in New York City— for those who aren’t familiar. 


As we were walking along, on one of those narrow cross streets — I can’t remember which one —we came upon a young, street musician. He was playing the hammered dulcimer —very well  The sound was fast, beautiful, harp-like. 


There was some kind of fence behind him, so the space was small and it was a bit hard to squeeze past him. 


He wasn’t very tall. I was still 5’7” then. I’ve shrunk since. He was about my size, maybe smaller. He had long blond hair, way past his shoulders, tho I think not as far as his waist. I like long hair on young men.   I don’t remember for sure if he had a beard. I like beards. I thought him as beautiful as the music he was making. 


I was too shy to ask his name, but I was definitely overcome with lust at the sight and sound of him. 


Given that it was Greenwich Village, i suppose he might have been gay. Her might not have survived the AIDS epidemic. 


I was thinking of him recently, because I finally gave in and subscribed to Apple Music. I requested hammered dulcimer, thinking of him. 


I found a nice album called “Joshua Messick: Pure Hammered Dulcimer”. Some of it is like what I remembered, tho I fancy that the guy I saw was even better. Of course, that was a long time ago, so I can’t be sure. 


Listening to that album made me think of him even more. 


I started fantasizing that I might go on some national TV talk show and ask if anyone could help me identify him. I wonder if there are shows like that where people try to find others from their past. I was imagining the Kelley Clarkson show, because I imagined she would appreciate his playing even more than I would, assuming he’s still playing. 


Of course, if I only had one moment on national TV, why would I waste it on this one guy, who I really never got to know?  There might be a better use of my moment of fame. 


Also, there was an inconsistency, in that, getting on national TV was somehow connected with a fantasy of dating Tom Cruise. And, if I were dating Tom Cruise, I shouldn’t be mentioning a fantasy of some other guy. 


In any case, in the fantasy, she did find him and she had him in the show and his playing was extraordinary, even though now he was playing the piano more often than the hammered dulcimer. I suspect the tone of the piano is better at blending with other instruments or voices and therefore more broadly used. She had tears in her eyes because his playing was so beautiful — and he was grateful for the exposure


It turned out he was bi and currently single so I had a shot at him, but I didn’t get past that, because I started writing this. 


I thought of this blog. In principle, everything on here is viewable by billions of people, who might find this guy for me. Of course, nothing like that many people ever in fact view it. I’m lucky to get a few dozen. 


Well, anyway, if you do know him or of him, let me know


****


I’m looking at the images of hammer dulcimers and I’m wondering if he might have been playing a different type of dulcimer instead. My memory is hazy


-- when I searched for hammered duclimer on Apple Music I found a wonderful album by Joshua Messick, called "Pure Hammered Dulcimer," which I highly recommend.

Saturday, July 19, 2025

Superman 2025

There are some spoilers in here.  This is sort of a stream of consciousness -- a bunch of reactions.

These comic book movies all have sort of the same plot. The villains are doing something that creates an existential threat to the human race.  The good guys have to stop them.  So, in some sense I feel like I'm watching the same movie over and over.

Superman is immediately recognizeable: tall, dark, handsome, muscly -- especially tiny waist, which is not the case with other actors who have played this role.

A post of mine from X about Superman romancing Lois Lane

Not to mention that the kicking fetus could also kill the human mother -- but then how did the Kents ever successfully raise him in the first place?  How would they survive toddler temper tantrums?  Yet, they are shown as almost magically loving.  I wonder if that's really all it takes.

And yet he romances Lois. 

In this version, Lois Lane knows who he is.  In the versions I knew before she didn't.  She also has an updated wardrobe and hairstyle -- while Superman is pretty much the same.  We don't see her feet.  She doesn't seem to be the sort to wear pumps with tiny, spike heels.  That affects how she walks.  She seems different from what I would expect from Lois -- more grounded, less plastic.

Somehow, to me, while this Superman's body is beautiful, his face is not.  In fact, the face of the evil clone seems somehow more his natural self.

I think Ultra Man is dead after this show -- but I don't like that.  I want to see a show about him.  I want to see his childhood.  I want to see him, ultimately, team up with Superman and not be just mindlessly bad. I think Corenswet would really blossom with that role.  I think he's a bit bland in this one.  Of course, in comic book world. Ultra Man could always be brought back, somehow.

I pointed out that a clone should be at least 20 years younger than the cloned person.  My son said "this is comic book cloning.  It just always works this way."  He was funny. He really liked the movie.  He went twice.

If Superman recharges via the sun, shouldn't he have a translucent outfit that lets visible light through to his skin?

I saw that Pom Klementieff played one of the robots.  I saw her recently in Mission Impossible VII & VIII.  I couldn't tell she was present in this movie, tho.  I guess they did motion capture.  Also the robot had a male voice, if I have the right robot.  I'm impressed with her.  I don't think she gets enough attention.

Superman is persecuted because he is an alien -- MAGA says that means the movie is "woke." I'm glad the writers added this aspect.

I always thought Jor-el was a good guy.  Here he seems like a bad guy.  I don't remember that from the comics.  I was sad about that; however, I was glad that Superman was not doomed to become evil, just because his dad wished that

Why is Lex Luthor so handsome?  That doesn't fit my idea of him.

Such a nice twist that the dumb, blond bimbo ends up cleverly figuring out how to save the day.

Jimmy Olsen turns out to be kind of a callous manipulator of the affections of this bimbo.  Gee.  I thought he was a just a cute little cub reporter.  Here he's cute, but not really likable.

There were really a lot of characters.  I don't even see the other super heroes like Element Man, Mr. Terrific, Green Lantern, Hawk Girl in the cast list on imdb -- yet they played important parts in the plot.  Why aren't they listed?

I guess that's why this has left me a little stunned & baffled -- and having trouble organizing my thoughts.  So many complicated things happened: anti-proton river, black hole, pocket universe, localized fusion reaction.  

How could even Superman have swum in such a river?  My son thought it was because the electron shells in the atoms of his body would repel the negative charges of the anti-protons.  

As always, I might edit this later.


Thursday, May 22, 2025

@TomCruise Mission Impossible VIII

I saw an ad for a special showing of the new Mission Impossible VIII movie. This one was supposed to be for IMAX with no trailers beforehand – not that I mind watching trailers, really, if I get there on time to see them. Sometimes they’re sort of interesting; but I wanted to show Tom, not that he’s ever really going to notice, that I  – *I* am a particularly loyal fan; and of course *I* would go to a *special* fan show.


I fantasize a lot about Tom. In this fantasy, he was going to pick out the first person to book the fan show in every theater in the country and then choose one at random to meet and it would be me. LOL


That didn’t happen. Not that I really thought it would.


And, naturally, because I always am, I was late. I was afraid I was going to miss part of the beginning of the movie, but it turned out there was at least one trailer. I saw it. It was a Superman trailer. I didn’t know they were coming out with another Superman movie. It wasn’t with Chris Reeve – it couldn’t have been – he’s dead after all; and before that he was paralyzed. I know a lot of people like Cavill. I see him come up quite often as a suggested video on Instagram. They must realize that a lot of people who are interested in Tom Cruise, like me, also are interested in him; but I’m not, really, because I haven’t seen one of his Superman movies. Maybe I should.


There is sort of a tradition that bad things happen to actors who play Superman. If I do go to the new Superman movie, and something bad happens to that actor, it’s going to be painful; if I get attached to him, which I suppose I would. That’s the whole idea. Superman is really intense beefcake.


Anyway, I saw a bit of the end of the Superman trailer, which reassured me that I hadn’t missed any of Mission Impossible VIII, though of course I did later, when I had to go to the bathroom. I’m an old lady. I have to go to the bathroom once an hour. A two hour and 49 minute movie means that I’m going to have to go to the bathroom a couple of times. That means I miss things.


They started out by saying the movie had been made for IMAX, so they were glad I was seeing it in IMAX. Most of the way through the movie, I realized that the seat I had chosen was probably not ideal for watching the full experience. I tend to sit in the back corner, because I’m a germaphobe. I figure there’s nobody breathing on me in the back corner. Therefore I’m less likely to get sick. I was also wearing a mask.


Actually, I needed the mask, because the theater was freezing – for warmth. I was wearing a heavy winter vest — also a sweater and heavy socks. I was happy that I found some fingerless gloves in the pocket of the vest, to help me feel less freezing. I really noticed I was cold when Tom was scuba diving in the Arctic Ocean. I thought maybe they made the theater freezing so we would feel sympathy for Tom as he was getting so cold; but it stayed freezing even when he changed his location to a warmer, sunnier climate; so maybe the low temperatures were not intentional. Who knows?


Tom is really into authenticity. Do you think he really swam wearing only shorts in the icy waters under the polar ice cap? That would be like him. Do you think he really went down to 500 feet below the surface and then swam up naked? hopefully it wasn’t that authentic. Shiver.


They didn’t emphasize, in the pre-movie publicity, how cold the water was. There were photographs of him wearing shorts deep under the water. I assumed that was so we would have a chance to view the work he did on his arms and legs with the bodybuilding. He did a good job with that. He was looking a little tubby after the shutdown. I guess he got depressed and ate a lot; like a lot of other people. However, he worked it off. I wonder if he used Ozempic? Or a similar drug? Probably not. He’s really into health and authenticity. He probably lost the weight the old-fashioned way.


But, as I was watching Tom, freezing in the Arctic Ocean, and freezing myself in the theater, I started wondering whether the stunts with him hanging off of an airplane, which we saw in the pre movie publicity, were actually a red herring. I’m not sure if they’ve ever done that. Do they create stunts for an actor to do to intrigue the audience, without those stunts actually being in the movie? I was really becoming persuaded that that was the case, but eventually we did get the stunt where he’s hanging off the airplane, so it wasn’t a red herring.


I was very happy to see that they corrected one obvious error in the previous movie. In the previous movie, they said they would have to destroy the source code to destroy the entity. As a former programmer, I thought that was nonsense. You need the source code to modify a program. Very few programs run by real time interpretation of source code. That would just not be very effective for such a powerful AI device as we are led to believe that entity is. In this movie, they say they have to modify the source code to create a modified entity. That is technically correct.


I was disappointed after the last movie that the McGuffin — a cruciform key – looked really fake. It certainly didn’t look like a piece of computer equipment. However, they did explain here that the key was supposed to open a lock to a vault that contain the source code, which made more sense – though it really still didn’t look like a real key. It looked like a children’s toy. Tom, with all his attention to authenticity, chose a really fake looking McGuffin.


I noted before and complain again about the fact that there are allowed to be men with gray hair in Tom’s movies, but no women with gray hair. He did at least bring in Angela Bassett as the president. She is actually in her 60s, according to the Internet, so we actually got an older woman, which is good. But she didn’t let us see any gray hair. She was wearing a wig or something.


I noticed, in the pre-movie publicity, that they had a party where Haley Atwell showed up and was pawing Tom. Interestingly, they had Rebecca Ferguson do that in at least one of those parties before a prior Mission Impossible. Hayley Atwell has made very clear that she’s not involved with Tom. Indeed, I believe she became engaged during the last movie — to somebody else. Moreover, she resented the fact that so many people were inferring that she was dating Tom because she was his costar in this movie. She pointed out, which is really true, that this is really harassing to imply that a woman is having sex with her boss. In the previous movie, there was no hint that her character was going to be involved romantically or sexually with Tom‘s character, or if there was, I missed it. Here, though, there is some of that.


I guess having Haley be physically flirtatious and touching Tom in a sensual way is one of the things they do for pre-film publicity. I don’t think he was ever involved with Rebecca Ferguson either.


In this movie they have Tom surrounded by women. There’s Haley Atwell; there’s the Asian martial arts expert; Angela Bassett; and an Inuit woman. After the movie, I like to watch the credits. I do this to see how many women are in the movie behind the scenes. I am gradually seeing an increase in the number of women; but it’s still vastly majority men.


Interestingly, they’re still having the Asian lady, Pom Klementieff, speak French, and then everybody just understands her; with no explanation of why they may understand French. I remember seeing a comment in the publicity for the last movie, that they chose to have that actress perform in French, which is her native language, because she acted better in that language. They did subtitle her French language commentary; however, when the Inuit woman spoke, they did not subtitle her. That seems odd, because a lot more people know French than know Inuit. 


They had a fair amount of flashbacks to old Mission Impossible movies. I thought that was so cool. There were images of Tom as a very young actor. His face has changed a lot. They also had at least one character come back from a previous movie who we haven’t seen in forever. He’s gone from being a dorky young man to being quite a graceful, attractive, older scientist, who is nevertheless still a nerd.


That’s something I’ve noticed about Tom also – and a lot of older performers. As they gain more experience, they gain more skill and subtlety in their performances. I tend to watch more singers than I watch movies. I noticed, for instance that both Neil Diamond and Dolly Parton have much improved stage presence over their younger selves. Whereas, the younger Tom would just sort of shout or bark lines and be intense all the time, the older Tom is more reflective. His voice is more subtle and nuanced. His voice has, as with so many men, gotten deeper with age. He’s really able to use it to growl and rumble, in a quiet, but dramatic, way. 


In the last movie, he really had a lot of crepey skin on his neck and big bags under his eyes. I don’t know what happened to that. His neck looks smoother. He has some wrinkles around his eyes, but not bags. He always swore he would never have plastic surgery. Still, I wonder if he has. It’s also possible that they can do amazing things with make up


One of my complaints about Mission impossible VII was that Tom looked so depressed. One of the things that I really like about Tom is that he is always, or at least most of the time, having a lot of fun when he acts. There can be suspense. I can be afraid for his safety. I can see stress on his face during those high drama action scenes. Yet, I know he’s having fun. He’s told us so. But I think it comes through. You can tell that he’s just having the time of his life, even though his character is really in serious danger and pain. I feel that Tom’s movies are fun to watch because he’s having fun.


 I especially noticed that in The Mummy. That is a horror movie. It should be terrifying; and there were scary scenes when the mummy lady was trying to kill him; but I never felt so deeply terrified as I usually do in horror movies. It was fun to watch, because I knew that, deep down, despite the suspense, Tom was having fun.


That’s part of what was so disappointing about Mission Impossible VII.  It just felt really depressing, because Tom seemed was depressed. Here, he has a grim determination– and you can see that there’s a certain amount of pessimism there; but there’s not that deep depression. I think the deep depression may have come from how much he disliked the shutdown. 


That shows how we’re different, he and I. I loved the shutdown. I loved the downsizing of my life and discovering zoom and not dining in restaurants, so I lost 10 pounds. Tom gained weight during the shutdown. I lost weight. It’s back on, now. That’s upsetting. Tom has gotten his super trim again.


Nevertheless, despite the fact that he looks good, when you look at his hands, you can see the age in them. That’s something I think it’s very hard to hide is the age of hands.


They have said this is the last mission impossible movie. Maybe so, but there’s sort of a hint that this might not in fact be the end.


When I came back from my second restroom break, I decided not to go back into the back corner of the theater. The theater was fairly empty. I had pretty much my choice of seats. I ended up going to the middle of the theater. I figured since Tom had made a big point of the fact that he made this movie for IMAX, I really should try to experience the IMAX fully, which I wasn’t doing so much when I was up in the back corner and behind the last speaker. So, yes, it did make a difference to sit in the theater center, because the sound was better there. Also, of course, the picture in front was bigger; tho somehow it didn’t seem as big as the first time I saw IMAX long ago. They’ve made all these theaters a lot smaller. The screen just didn’t seem to be that big. Therefore, even though this was an IMAX theater, and even though it was, supposedly, a special fan showing, I don’t think it was exactly what Tom intended.


Naturally, of course, all of the camera work, lighting, scenery, costumes were highly professionally done. The action was tight. It held my attention, for sure. Curiously, sometimes I put my arms in the air because it seemed to make it easier to deal with the stress of the suspense.


Even though he films all over the world, there is something so very quintessentially Hollywood about Tom. He spent his whole adult life just totally immersing himself with every aspect of cinema. It was interesting that they chose him to represent the film industry, and the city of Los Angeles, at the Olympics. There’s something about a really tough notch, Hollywood film, that just is peerless. That was definitely in evidence here.


Even though I love fantasizing about Tom, I know that we’re very different people and in all likelihood we wouldn’t be at all compatible. I think of him as being a jock and myself as being a nerd. Look at how long this blog is becoming! Yet, when it comes to cinema, he is very much of a nerd, as well. He knows and wants all the very best movie making technology in his films. That comes through.