Sunday, July 16, 2023

@joshgroban in @sweeneytoddbway

I was, at one time, totally obsessed with Josh Groban. I hung out on Twitter every night until 3 am chatting with other Grobanites and waiting for Josh to tweet. 

He knew we were there. Things happened that made it clear that he was reading what we were writing. Other Grobanites noticed also. 


There was a mysterious list of people who had tweeted him. Maybe he started it. As soon as you started tweeting him, you would get on the list. Maybe he followed the list so he could keep track of us.    But he was definitely reading, trying to see what we would say about him. 


Sometimes he directly answered a tweet. That happened to me several times. Or sometimes I would post a question and he would answer it in an interview. 


I started calling him my three quarters friend. There was obviously some communication back and forth, but there was also a disconnect.       


There were people who were obsessed with him, who followed the social media of women who had been spotted with him. There were comments made on Twitter by these women that seemed to be about him without actually mentioning his name. There were websites where people gossiped about these women. 


Some of these comments made him sound somewhat unsavory. I don’t want to repeat what was said. There’s every reason to think it was unreliable. 


 Yet, I believed them enough to step back from my obsession with him. 


The voices were spectacularly beautiful. The music was complex and fast. Singing some of those songs was like trying to say a tongue twisters faster and faster “Sally sells sea shells…”


Josh’s singing was magnificent, astonishing, loud, clear, well enunciated, and heading into bass territory. I wonder whether, after all these years of trying to be the barytenor that David Foster wanted him to be, he’s finally allowed to let us hear the strongest part of his voice — or whether his voice has simply gotten lower with age. That happens to many men.


He’s always been a great singer, but there was a step beyond here. Beyond great, as if he had woken up to a new level. There was that one song, I wish I could remember its name, where really his voice was like thunder. It was late in the first half. Perhaps someone will tell me which one it was. Perhaps I’ll get the record.


But it took me back to the unsavory things that were said about him, way back then, making me wonder if they were true, making me wonder his lifelong obsession with this show reflects something inside of him. It definitely has been a lifelong obsession. He named his dog Sweeney.


I was so surprised to discover that the song “nothing’s gonna harm you” was actually not Sweeney‘s song. It was someone else. That’s a song he’s sung in many many concerts for years. I assumed that whatever role that song was, he would sing the role that song came with — but, no, it was a different role.


He said something in some video that I saw that led me to believe he learned that song when he was four years old. Is it possible that his parents could’ve taken him to see *this* musical when he was four years old? Doesn’t seem like a good idea.


When I was a child, I saw “The Wizard of Oz” many times. I came to learn that it came on every spring. I would watch the newspaper for it. At first, I found the wicked witch very frightening. Later, I came to admire her iconic performance. 


I learned that, while Judy Garland died relatively young of drug addiction, Margaret Hamilton lived to be 83. By all reports, Hamilton was a lovely person who worked for a time as a kindergarten teacher and became very concerned at how frightening her performance had been — concerned about its effects on children. 


I developed a theory. I thought, perhaps, if you put all your goodness into your performances, you would take home the bad; while, if you put all your badness into your performance, you could take home your good. Maybe it will be that way for Josh. 


They did have Josh dancing briefly on stage. Anyone who knows Josh will know that that is kind of incredible. It was very brief though. On the other hand, I’ve noticed that as he’s gotten older, he’s gotten less inhibited. There has been a swimsuit photo that would’ve been impossible even 10 years ago. He’s been on stage with sequins. That also would’ve been impossible 10 years ago. During the Awake tour, he wore a T-shirt, as I recall. Also, during the Awake tour, he was running on stage, so a suit jacket would’ve gotten sweaty.


I should say something about the other performers.. It’s a large cast. In some ways, I found Annaleigh Ashford to be at least as good as Josh, if not better, not so much for her singing, but for her comedic abilities. It’s not exactly that she made me laugh, but she was a comedic actress in a tragic/horror musical. 


I found Ruthie Ann Miles‘ singing very intriguing. She had both a high, haunting soprano, and a loud, low belt. I’ve been criticized for having a lack of passagio. I didn’t hear any passagio from her. It was two voices. That’s the way I sing. I thought that meant I couldn’t sing on Broadway, but she’s doing it, and she sounds great.


I’ll have to look at the program and see if my memory is sparked about any of the other performers.


One of the reasons that I got disenchanted, with Josh, also, was the horrendous audio issues in his concerts. The audio was frequently way too loud and horribly distorted. At the NASA County Coliseum, they shone bright spotlights in our eyes, which was very painful. Theater, I knew that sort of thing wasn’t going to happen.


Still, I did go, even though I’m planning to have surgery in a couple of weeks, and getting a bug would be really bad from the perspective of having my surgery. I noticed that, although theater was packed, there were very few older people there.  I think people my age are not going out that much still.  Older people are still having severe consequences from Covid. That’s noticeable, because Josh has often had a contingent of older fans. I didn’t notice that the younger women behind me were saying his name over and over again. Therefore, there are definitely young women interested in him.


I really have to ask myself why I’m still so attached to him, despite all that’s gone on, that I would go out and take a risk with my health. I thought that attendance was dropping off at the seat at the show, because I’ve seen him advertising a lot; and the advance ticket sales have been way down. 


Nevertheless, the show was absolutely packed. I thought maybe I wouldn’t have much of a chance later. I needn’t have worried so much. Still, I suspect, this show will not have as long of a run as “Natasha Pierre, and the great Comet of 1812” had. Despite the brilliant performances, the subject matter is very disturbing.


I still have a weird sense of loyalty to him. There’s still something in my head that tells me he’s my 3/4 friend. I have met them a few times in person. There was a time when I would’ve gone after the show to get my program signed at the stage door. I didn’t even try that this time. I hadn’t had dinner yet, but it wasn’t worth it to me.


He might recognize me. He’s met me a few times, because I used to do that stage door thing, and one time I paid a lot of money to go to an event, where he would see me in person. I doubt that I would be important to him, even if he did recognize me. There are so many other fans.


And, yet, there’s that sense in my head that my 3/4 friend has a show that might have sales falling off, and maybe I really should go show up.


I should feel that way about “Triple Threat”. The guy who’s doing that (off-Broadway) show really is my friend. I did see it online, when it was streamed, though. It was really great, and very inspiring. If you get a chance, go see that. 


There was a long line for the women's room.  Fortunately, it did move quickly, but they restarted after intermission, before everyone got in.  That's not ok.  They should wait.

I was in a theater this summer that had made the restrooms co-ed and made sure that there were enough of them for people to get through quickly.   This involved making stalls that were private -- with floor to ceiling walls and doors with door jams.  Sinks were out in public. 

I don't think I'll buy the album for this show, tho, after all.  As beautiful as the music was, it's not exactly easy listening.

I tend to like to be in the back at the top, and did even before the pandemic, because I figure that germs are heavier than air and will tend to fall down into the orchestra.  The back row seems to be universally sold out on these shows, curiously.  Maybe it was cheaper.  

However, I realized I was out of practice.  I didn't think to bring binoculars, so I could see the performers's faces.  I know what Josh looks like, but not the others.  Maybe when you buy a seat near the back, they should suggest binoculars.

The lady next to me left her umbrella.  I tried to call out to her, but she was lost in the crowd.

#SweeneyTodd #Sondheim #JoshGroban #Groban #LuntFontanneTheatre #RestroomLines #Broadway #LostUmbrella

Thursday, July 13, 2023

@tomcruise #MissionImpossibleVII #MissionImpossibleDeadReckoningPart1

I'm a longstanding Tom Cruise fan.  I've mostly been tweeting about my interest in pop singers, recently, but he's been there all along -- in my fantasies.

I actually went to see this movie on opening night -- very unusual for me, but I went to the 10:55 pm show, so there were only 5 of us in the theater.  Wednesday is senior day at my theater, so I got in for half price.  It occurs to me that this wasn't a great day to open a show.  In some areas, it was too hot to go outdoors.  In some areas there was flooding.  We had an air quality alert -- recommending that we not go out -- tho I'm not sure that it's possible to keep ozone out of your house.

Actually, being in the movie theater was fabulous.  They upgraded their filtration during the pandemic.  The air was great.  I found that my balance and focus, which had been affected by the ozone, were much better once I got into the theatre.  Everyone should go to the movies during Air Quality Alerts.

I know Tom has said that he likes to go on opening night so that he can enjoy the crowds. I'm still sort of quarantining.  

I noticed that the previews were much louder than the movie.  I wore ear plugs during the previews.  Also, I didn't feel attracted to any of those movies.  Somehow they seem to have not gotten my genre.  Except maybe the one about Bob Marley would be interesting.

Anyway, one of the things about action movies with Tom has been that I know he's having fun when filming.  He just loves this process, passionately.  Even tho some of these movies are very suspenseful and violent, somehow the fact that he's having fun comes through and makes the movie seem lighter.  

I really noticed that during his mummy movie.  I wouldn't normally go see a horror movie about mummies, but I went because of him and wasn't disappointed.  That underlying feeling that it was a fun experience came through.  

I haven't seen all his mission impossible movies.  I did see IV and loved it.

This one was different from what I expected, though.  Tom's character had become much more conflicted.  He really looked miserable a lot of the time.  Probably he was miserable. He has talked about how hard the shut down was for him and he was filming during the shut down.

Maybe he's getting into more nuanced acting.  A lot of people have said that they think he can't really act.  Maybe he was trying to prove them wrong.

I really like what Katherine Hepburn said about acting -- that her fans wanted to see her, her on screen persona, in different roles.  They didn't want her to be completely method.  They wanted her familiar personality to come through.  She had a certain amusing spunk.  It was fun to watch.

Tom has been like that too.  He loves the stunts.  His love of those stunts comes through -- subtly, without destroying the suspense.  I remember after one of the Mission Impossible movies (maybe IV) it was said that he wanted to do the bungie jumping stunt over and over, far beyond the number of takes required for the movie, just because he loved the bungie jumping.

In the pre-movie publicity, they got into that as well -- talking about all the prep he did for the scene where he rides a motorcycle off a cliff.   He spent months breaking down the parts of the stunts, so that he could put them together without dying.  

The fact that he was portraying fear, sadness, hatred, even depression much more effectively than ever before, in my opinion, took away from the enjoyableness of the movie.  I don't want him to be a method actor.  I want him, like Katherine Hepburn being Katherine Hepburn, to be Tom Cruise -- cool, collected -- cruising above the hoy polloi.

I also want to address the women.  The mission impossible team has the classic sexist composition of three men and one women -- the classic composition that has shut so many females out of acting, while providing more opportunities for men -- even though the pool of aspiring actors is more heavily female than male.  However, here they did add some prominent women -- so there were 4 of them  -- tho many more men than women in under five roles.

YET... I can't help but notice that Tom is in there -- heavily made up to look younger -- at 60, while the prominent women are all *much* younger.  There aren't any older women.  

Hellooo, Tom! I know you want to be inclusive. Where are the older women?  

I found parts of the movie fairly confusing.  There were multiple teams of people going after the MacGuffin.  I found it hard to keep track of who was who.  Who was behind which team?  Who was supposed to be in the US government team?  Who was in the main antagonist's team?  Too many faces.  More diversity might have helped.  They did have a prominent black and a prominent Asian who were easier to spot and keep track of.  However, there weren't so many diverse people in the under five roles in the teams.  Part of this was intentional, with the masks and all, but part of it was just too many people on screen.

They did say that they were making a lot of things go on at once so that people would have to have a big screen to see it.  But I would have to see it multiple times to see all that stuff. That might benefit them, but not me so much.

There was no obvious LGBTQ representative.  My son noticed in the latest SpiderMan movie there everyone was hetero normative. Here there wasn't a whole lot of sex/romance -- a bit of cuddling -- but no one had time for sex.  Some people were probably just single, which is good, as most people in the USA are now single.  However, my son is sensitive to this because his sister and other parent are trans -- so he wants to see more diversity in the the LGBTQ area as well.  

OTOH, when most people's love lives are not examined, I guess it doesn't matter.  This is more about people's professional/financial lives and less about their romances.  The typical Bond movie will always have a gratuitous sexual scene.  Why? It's good to avoid that.  Let's focus on the action.  I'm glad that they did.

I was really happy to see that the Russian submarine and its crew were not antagonists.  That was a disturbing part of Top Gun Maverick -- escalating the cold war mentality.  Here they avoided that, which is a good thing.

Hayley Atwell is a great magician, btw.

Anyway, like Top Gun Maverick, I'm going to say this is a good movie, but not a great movie.  I enjoyed it.  It hung together. The camera work was generally good -- except for the confusing part with so many people on screen.  The scenery was gorgeous in many places. The plot hung together. The suspense was good.  

I'll go to see the sequel -- but, Tom, please try to be a bit less depressing, ok?

#TomCruise #AirQualityAlert #movies #MIVII #MissionImpossibleSeven #MissionImpossibleDeadReckoning #stunts #russians #RussianTropes

As usual, I reserve the right to edit this later.