Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Take it down @joshgroban!

Is it still up there?  Surely he’ll have taken it down by now.  He’s a sane fellow.  Surely it will come to him that he’s overdone it this time?

No.  It’s still up.  

Why does the “f” word bother me?

1. I grew up in a community and a family where it wasn’t used and was considered offensive.

2. When other people use it around me, I feel sexually harassed.  They are imposing their sexual thoughts and feelings on me in an unwanted and unsolicited manner.

3. People use this word like “um.”  Amongst young comedians in New York City, who I hang out with, it is commonly used in every sentence -- sometimes several times in a sentence. They know that if they say “Um, well, you know, like…” they will sound dumb.  They have acting and public speaking training.  They know simple rules of articulateness -- BUT they think that, if they substitute the “f” word or the “s” word, no one will notice their mental blanks spots.  They still sound dumb.  When you say the “f” word and the “s” word in virtually every sentence, you sound really, really dumb.

4. I have mild Giles de la Tourette’s Syndrome, with occasional involuntary speaking.  So far, this has never resulted in coprolalia, but then I was raised by people who never used profanity.  It was a very scary thing when my father said “heck,” for instance, because at that time it was unacceptable even to say “hell,” and “heck” was the next closest thing. But sometimes I find now myself using profanity at home, alone.  This scares me.  These foul mouthed kids I hang out with are infecting my speech.

I am literally traumatized  by the use of this word.  It hurts me.  I hate it.  I feel like I'm being beaten every time it is spoken.

But the fact that the “f” word bothers me is not the only issue here.  In this tweet that Josh retweeted on December 29, the “f” word is inserted between the word “Jesus” and the word “Christ.”  This is blatantly offensive to people of the Christian faith.

Now Josh is very PC.  He would never say anything to offend African Americans or gay people or Muslims or Hindus.  Why is it ok to offend Christians?  

It seems especially hypocritical to me that a man who started his career peddling Christian music thinks it’s ok to offend Christians.

I’m not a traditional Christian myself.  I, like Josh, was raised Episcopalian, but nowadays I call myself an eclectic universalist — and I’m also a member of a Friends Meeting, but they don’t impose any particular creed on me.  Still, as a universalist, I would never intentionally say something that would be hurtful to someone of any faith, unless it was part of a legitimate, constructive discussion — not just casually blowing off steam.

Granted this fan who was retweeted has a legitimate gripe with the cost of college. I feel for her.  But that doesn’t mean that she needs to make religiously offensive statements.  And it most especially does not mean that Josh has to retweet these statements to almost 800k people.

Some fans have complained that they think Josh is sadistic, that he says things just to get a rise out of his fans -- that he loves seeing us get all atwitter (pun intended), that the ruckus appeals to his sadistic side.  Really?  It’s ok to torture people for fun?

Take it down @joshgroban.  Take it down.

------------------

Addendum 1/13/15

It's still up there tho you have to scroll down a bit to find it -- December 29.  

Monday, December 29, 2014

Progress on the quixotic quest


I'm seeing a bit of progress on my quixotic quest for the world anthem.  If you want to know more about my history with this quest, please search this blog for "quixotic."

This was my original letter to Josh Groban on this topic Letter to Josh to start you out.

UN Imagine Project


I recently noticed Jackie Evancho participating in the UN #IMAGINE project, via the following YouTube video:


JACKIE EVANCHO AND FRIENDS FOR UN #IMAGINE PROJECT

This project is trying to get people all over the world to sing John Lennon's song "Imagine" together.

If you want to register for this project, go to the following link

 UN #IMAGINE PROJECT

This song is a very popular song, worldwide, and it does advocate for world peace, which is cool, but I'm surprised that UNICEF chooses it, because it is fundamentally an atheist song -- imagining no God.  This isn't a very unifying theme in a world where many people are far from being atheists.  I would prefer a song that is religion neutral.  Still, I'm glad that they're trying.

Unfortunately, tho, I don't see how you can participate in the project unless you have an iphone or an ipad.  I personally have an Android phone.  How do I sign up?  I don't know yet.

Free U2 song


Since I originally formulated this quixotic quest, I've broadened it somewhat.  I would like to see multiple opportunities for international celebration: not only singing a world anthem together, but also having international holidays, where everyone celebrates or laughs together, like the Mayan Apocalypse . I would like to see the development of international culture, a sense of us, rather than us/them.

In this respect I am noticing that a free song that I got from Sony/U2 called "Invisible" has this as part of the chorus.  "There is no us. There is no them."  I'm not sure if Sony gave this song away free, because they wanted to promote a U2 album, or whether they were pushing it as a song to promote World Peace.  I find the song a bit difficult to follow, but I am noting that this piece of the chorus is a peace theme (semi-accidental pun) and generally in line with my quixotic quest ideas, so I'm glad that Sony decided to distribute it so broadly.

Anyway, I continue to be encouraged about what seems like some gradual progress on my quixotic quest idea.




Sunday, December 21, 2014

The Messiah, Avery Fisher Hall, 12/17/14



This was the third concert in the series that I got because I wanted to see Josh on September 17.

The first I blogged about already.  

The second was disappointing to me, because I went hoping to hear Joshua Bell play, but I experienced narcolepsy as soon as his bow hit the stings. That's been a recurring problem for me: classical music giving me narcolepsy. So I can't even describe his playing. That's one if the things I've always hated about classical music.

After Bell was a piece by a Russian composer, whose music kept me awake by the crude device of extremely loud drumming. Just not a great experience.   I do wonder if they're adequately monitoring that carbon dioxide in those places, or whether it's really the music itself.

Anyway, the Messiah, I'm glad to report, did not give me narcolepsy. I'm not sire I've every heard the whole thing before. It's really quite a long piece. I did get a bit drowsy and bored by end, but basically it was a good experience, and no narcolepsy. Perhaps that was because of the vocal solos having a different acoustic quality from the violin. Perhaps it was better ventilation. I'm not sure, but I appreciated the difference.

I am a real sucker for child singers. They had am eleven year old boy, Connor Tsui, singing a few passages. His voice and diction were delightfully clear and strong, and he was the only one on stage who had memorized his part.

I once sang at least part of the Messiah. I seem to recall the soloists bring soprano, alto, tenor, bass. Here they had soprano, countertenor, tenor, bass. I suppose this was more authentic, as probably they had no women singing on stage in Handel's time, and the countertenor was excellent, but it did feel a bit male dominated.

I thought the baritone was the weakest soloist. The part called for a bass. I was craving someone with a deeper, more booming voice.

This was an evening where I was acutely conscious of how exciting it is to be in NYC during the Christmas season.


I walked from Grand Central Station to Lincoln Center via Rockefeller Center and Columbus Circle. Rockefeller Center was jammed with tourists. It was almost impossible to get through there.   I thought about how people watch this stuff on TV and YouTube all over the world, and I get to go there all the time.

I remembered seeing David Foster performing there at Rockefeller Center via the Internet. He came from California to do that.

When they sang the Alleluia chorus during the Messiah, I cried. I was so glad to get to experience that.  

Friday, December 5, 2014

"Home Free" Sugar Loaf Performing Arts Center 12/5/14

I just got back from a concert by the a cappella vocal group “”Home Free” at the Sugar Loaf Performing Arts Center in Chester, NY.

This was such a fun time.  I can’t recommend them highly enough.   This a peppy group, with a lot of funny songs and extraordinary performers and performances.  

Here are links to a some  of their YouTube videos.  These people really do sound just as good in person as in these videos.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0l3dsHCScxU (including Avi Kaplan of Pentatonix)


This group of five young men recently won a TV singing contest called “Sing Off” on NBC.  They include a remarkable vocal percussionist, Adam Rupp, and a remarkable basso profundo, Tim Faust; along with superb tenors and a decent baritone.  More about the group https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Free_(group)

This group features solos by all of their performers, so that you can really hear each intriguing voice.  

The bass, who can also sing tenor, gets to be a lead quite often, which is not the traditional thing with vocal groups.  Tim Faust was for me the big draw.  He actually wrote or arranged several of the songs they perform.

Here’s an example of a wonderful song that Tim wrote


The solo by the vocal percussionist was probably the most exciting thing about this show.  This one performer filled the theater for an extended solo which had us all on our feet twice.  

They also told us that the two albums that they’ve issued with the current composition of the group have been in the billboard top 100 albums this year.  I personally purchased “Crazy Life,” their debut album with the current group and love it.

I’m interested that I enjoy this group, because normally I don’t like country music.  I think the difference is that they *are* a cappella, so there are no strummed guitars, which are normally present in country music.  I generally can’t tolerate the sound of amplified strummed guitars.  They aggravate my auditory sensitivities.  So I’m pleased that this group has a different take on the genre.

I didn’t write down the set list.  I was a bit surprised, because I had been watching YouTube videos of their previous tour, which was promoting the previous album, Crazy Life.  This tour was promoting their current album, which is a Christmas album.  I was a bit uncomfortable, because the friend I had brought with me is Jewish, but fortunately she liked the music anyway.  Plus they only focused the first half on the Christmas album.  They had some of the songs from the Crazy Life album in the second half.

I’m not quite sure that I like this style of singing for traditional carols like “Oh Holy Night,” but I’ll have to listen some more, because I do like the group.

Afterwards they did hang around to autograph albums, but I didn’t stay for that.  Probably that was a mistake.  It think this group is going to be big, I mean even bigger than they already are, but I just didn’t have the energy.

There was a great variety of ages in the audience and both female and male fans.  The audience was almost exclusively white, with a few Asians, from what I could see.

The facility
————————

I had also never been to the Sugar Loaf Performing Arts Center before.  It’s a really cool place, which has a sort of country/western theme, with the balcony looking vaguely reminiscent of a hay loft.  Also, the parking is free, which you don’t see closer in to New York City. There were ample restrooms and a lovely entry and concession area.

I had two complaints about this facility, just for the record

1) they seemed to use real smoke rather than water vapor for effects during the show.  This sometimes had my eyes burning and coughing.  I can’t imagine what it must have been like for the singers.


2) the concession stand did not have coffee, which is not great for a place in an isolated rural area, where you have to drive home late at night through dark and rainy highways.

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Musings on BDSM

All the discussion of BDSM and mistreatment of girlfriends lately has made me think of some stuff out of my personal experiences.

Situation #1: dating a person into BDSM

This experience came out of dating.  I started what I hoped would be a relationship with a former professional colleague, who I had always been fond of and whose wife had died only two months before of natural causes, after an apparently successful 40 year marriage.  

Shortly into this relationship, my friend mentioned that he and his late wife had been into BDSM.  He liked being a dom and he claimed that his late wife had enjoyed being a sub.

I was horrified.  I imagined him taking pleasure in causing me pain, whether emotional or physical.  Suddenly, this man who I had always liked and respected turned into a monster in my mind.

I went home, grabbed my pillow and started bashing it against the wall, pretending the pillow was his head.  I was so angry that I went to a therapist who I had seen in the past to ask if I had become dangerous.

She didn’t think so, but she thought that it was clear that I didn’t want to be in a BDSM relationship.

My professional relationship with this man had been so long and so cordial, and I respected his professional abilities so much, that we managed to remain friends after this.  He explained more to me.  

His wife had been the eldest of four children and had been put in a position of responsibility to watch her younger siblings.  She had evolved into the sort of person who always took leadership roles.  He, on the other hand, had never been a leader type at all, and tended to get into subordinate roles outside the marriage.  Therefore both of them, in the bedroom, enjoyed pretending to take the opposite role from there natural type.  He said that it was role playing game that both of them enjoyed. They had even regularly attended a social club with other couples who enjoyed playing this game.

I could not check with his late wife whether, in fact, she enjoyed this game, or whether she only pretended to enjoy it to please him.  BUT, in asking around some of my other friends, I found two other women who  were very much alive and told me that they enjoyed being subs.  They told me this when we were alone together and they were not in relationships, so there was no one coercing them to say so.  

Therefore I believed them — and consequently believed that what my male friend had said was possible.  His late wife might have enjoyed playing this game with him.  I still wasn’t entirely convinced that she hadn’t pretended to enjoy it out of some sense of obligation, but I couldn’t prove anything one way or another.

It was very clear to me, tho, that I could not enjoy this game, or, if I were to play it, I would have to be dom, not the sub.  Nevertheless, I still was clear that I would not likely enjoy it and would rather be with someone who would not want to play it.

********

Situation #2: raising a sadistic child with Asperger’s Syndrome

My older son was very frightening as a toddler. 

Once we were in a grocery store when he was 2 or 3 and he asked whether we could kill the lady in using the next door of the freezer case.  He said this, I believe, because she was black.  

It took me a long time to figure out why he was so afraid of black people, but after some role playing with dolls, I figured out that he was afraid of our cleaning company.  This was because he was afraid of vacuum cleaners.  He did not have a good sense of relative size and he thought the vacuum cleaners could suck him up.  Our cleaning company was composed of black men and these were the only black people he knew, so he feared black people.  

In any case, it was horrifying to have him say this in the grocery store.  I asked him how he would feel if someone were to say the same thing about him.  He screeched in response and did not answer.  I couldn’t tell if he understood the question.

Another time, when he was about 4, we were in a restaurant and he tried to trip a woman passing our table.  She was angry.  He seemed to be clueless about what might be wrong with this.

Similarly, when we were stuck in traffic, he wanted us to kill all the people in front of us.

These frightening statements continued when he went to school.  He physically attacked teachers.  He talked about blowing up the school, electrocuting his classmates, and putting people from his after school program through a meat grinder.  He attacked his older second cousin with a gardening tool in a frightening manner.

My husband (now ex) and I were terrified.  We thought we might be raising another Unabomber.  My son was intelligent, but his ideation was totally off.

We learned that he suffered from Asperger’s Syndrome and that this disorder prevented him from having empathy.  We got him into therapy and into a special program in school.  

His therapists and his teachers focused on trying to teach him to understand social relationships and empathy.

Gradually, over the years, his desire to kill people morphed into a desire to annoy them.  He talked about tying strings all over a room to make it difficult for people to get through.  He sometimes spoke in an unintelligible language that would force others to figure out what he was saying.  He also was fascinated with putting up other barriers.  I would call this his sadistic period.  A time when he wanted to annoy people and watch them get frustrated.

Professionals kept working with him.  By the time he got to high school he had become a very right thinking, hyper moral person, overly rigid, but not frightening at all.  This was due to years and years of work by many caring professionals: special ed teachers, social workers, and therapists.  He still has issues, but he’s not a frightening, violent person now.

During his sadistic period, his desire to annoy or emotionally injure others was part of his disability, an autism spectrum disorder.  He lacked empathy.  He did not understand the concept of his having an effect on other people.

***********

Now let us suppose that, instead of getting so much therapy and intervention, we had let my son grow up into a sadistic adult.  My son’s sadism would not have been the same as that of my friend who viewed BDSM as a social game to enjoy with a consenting partner.  My son’s sadism would have been based on a real, warped desire to see people suffer.

This makes me wonder, for the woman who wants to go into a BDSM relationship with a larger, stronger, wealthier man: how she would know whether he was of the first or second type?  Presumably the second type might, over time, learn how to mask what was really going on.  

I wonder about this concept of “safe” words also.  If one were in a sexual encounter — and one’s larger, stronger partner suddenly became unexpectedly violent and rough — would one remember the “safe” word when frightened, injured, and angry?  Instead, might it not be more likely that one would simply scream, or say “no” or “stop,” which might make the perpetrator more violent?


I still find this whole topic disturbing.

*************

Addendum: I don't want to express an opinion about the truth or falsity of certain rumors.  However, I do feel that people's reactions to these rumors might depend on who they perceive BDSM.  Is it a fun role playing game? Or does it really involve hurting people?

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Silent Night with Descant

Oh, dear.

I posted these youtube videos back in 2011.

descant take 1

descant take 2 [actually the second take is much worse than the first, so you should really only watch the first ]

I learned the descant in elementary school.  It was written by my elementary school music teacher Dorothy L. Williams (1924-2011)

I got the sheet music for the descant from  a childhood friend who was in the same grade as I was in my elementary school.  Another friend, from the same grade, got permission from her children for us to use the descant, so long as we credited her.

When I got the sheet music, I realized I had made some errors in singing it.  I always meant to correct the errors, but I never got a round to it.  Now these things have a lot of views and people are learning the descant wrong.

Here is the old sheet music, that originally appeared on a purple mimeograph.  Please use this instead of what I sang.


There was an odd synchronicity about these videos.  I started getting obsessed with this song that I remembered from elementary school (1960-1968) and made the videos.  Then I learned that Mrs. Williams had just died.  So there was a weird element of ESP about the whole thing.  I should do this again to make sure it's correct.


Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Gossip

Does he have multiple partners?
Is he into BDSM?
Does he enjoy hurting women physically and emotionally?
Does he use women and dump them, leaving a trail of broken hearts?
Does he use non disclosure agreements and lawyers to keep women quiet, so that he can continue his predatory behavior?
Is his secrecy merely a quirky neurosis, or is there really something to hide?
Is the most recent big announcement real? Or a sham to distract us from the truth?
If rumors proved true, would I still be a fan of his music or other performances, or would I condemn them along with him? 
Was my fandom ever about anything other than his talent and compatibility of musical taste? Did I require him to play a particular role in my fantasy life that is not possible in the face of these rumors?
Why else do I want to know about these rumors?
Is it titillating?
Am I Sir Galahad off to rescue damsels in distress from soulless cads?
Is that a good role for me to play?
Were they really damsels in distress, or selfish social climbers who hoped to take advantage of a celeb?
And why do I want to talk about them?
What if Hitler had written a beautiful song, would it be wrong to sing it?

Recently, a celeb was fired, because of allegations about his personal life:

BLGTQ people have gone to great lengths to bring their relationships out of the closet, and to be accepted. Should polygamy/polyamory be more broadly accepted? When is BDSM acceptable? Where do we draw a line about what is not acceptable?  Should celebs be held to a higher standard because they are role models? Or are they inherently corrupted by their wealth and power, so that we are doomed to find them all scandal ridden and behaving worse than civilians? Is there inherently an abuse of power when a  celeb seeks to be a dom over a non celeb, because the non celeb will feel compelled to do things to please the celeb? Is there inherently abuse of power in most cases when men are doms over women, because men are typically larger, more aggressive, and control the money in a relationship?

 In general, when is private behavior relevant to a job?

A sports player, Ray Rice, who abused a woman, has also been in the news. His professional career was also ruined.  Perhaps this was at least in part because, as a celeb, he is viewed as needing to be an example.

But what about non-celebs? When should they lose their job over private behavior? Should it have to be an actual crime? 


And a final note: Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. Wouldn't it be better to let the women talk, rather than risk the explosion of their bottled up fury?  What if one of them committed suicide?

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Is "Noël" porn?

Is Noel Porn?

Since my most recent blog, I’ve been thinking about this.

David Foster finds this very shy, timid, deferential guy with a beautiful voice.  The guy is only 17.  He seems to come from a good family.  He does what he’s told.  He records Christian music, even though he’s not a traditional Christian, but doesn't dare say so.

Later, as the guy gets older, we start to see him a bit more clearly.  He grew up in an urban environment in L.A.  He may be spiritual, but is clearly not a conservative Christian. Rumors start flying that he’s not monogamous, that he’s kinky.  We don’t know whether those rumors are true, but we see more and more clearly that he’s an extremely sexual person.

But isn’t that common amongst religious people? Isn’t there a sexual intensity about charismatic Christians?

As a person who studied yoga, I became aware that mystics commonly advise celibacy, because physical sex weakens the mental orgasm that accompanies an intense mystical experience.  Mystics are people who value that mental experience enough that they happily forego the physical experience to get the mystical one.

I had a roommate in college who became a born again Christian who insisted that the relationship with God could be an erotic one.  I read an academic article once quoting the reported sensations that a nun felt while praying intensely.  The author opined that these sensations were in fact an orgasm.  At least one TV evangelist, recently, has been involved in a sex scandal.  One is loudly proclaiming that promiscuity is normal amongst straight men and should not be considered sinful or shocking.

So David Foster puts out this album, featuring this young man, who, as we now start to see, is in fact an intensely sexual being.  The passion in his voice hypnotizes us.  It intensifies our own spiritual experience in listening to religious music, because spirituality is in fact intensely wrapped up in sexuality.

Sex is never mentioned.  The album sounds pure as the driven snow, in a context where many traditional Christians, following the example of the staid St. Paul, believe that sex is dirty or evil.

And yet wasn’t sex the message that was both sent and received with Noël?

Is there not a kinky or even obscene aspect to an album, if that album is dishonestly sexual?  

Again, are we not hypocritical if we become shocked to consciously discover a sexual aspect of the singer, if we were subliminally enjoying it all along?

And, then, Josh complains of middle aged women fondling him when he goes into the audience during concerts.  Maybe he shouldn't be surprised.




Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Kerfuffle in Grobania -- Josh steps on the Red Carpet with Kat

Oh, my!  Just when we started saying that twitter was getting dull, just when we started saying we were going to do something else, BOOM!  Drama erupts.  Josh is dating!  And who?  Who? 

She has big breasts.  There were leaked nude photos. (I’m not going to put up the link to the nude photos.  I think it should be crime to leak nude photos without the permission of the model) A woman previously connected with Josh is “devastated.”

Some fans react negatively.  Josh wasn’t who they thought, they say. 

Some reactions here, myself.

Young women often don’t understand the implications of posing nude.  We saw that, sadly, when Vanessa William’s Miss America crown was stolen from her, because nude photos got leaked, by some unscrupulous person; after she had lied and said there were no nude photos.

I remember that incident.  

I learned then that young female performers are often persuaded to do nude photos by photographers who don’t care at all for the performer, but only about earning some extra bucks.  And, once the photos are leaked, they can never be undone.

As a result of reading about this, I would never let a lover or my husband photograph me nude.  I was horrified that a nurse did it after childbirth and I took the photos to be developed by a male stranger without knowing that those photos were on the film.  Fortunately, we don’t have film any more.

We saw another curious example recently, where Miley Cyrus provoked great consternation with her “twerking.”  Miley cited Sinead O’Connor as her inspiration.  The older singer had done something similar.

Sinead then wrote an open letter to Miley urging Miley not to follow Sinead’s example.  http://music-mix.ew.com/2013/10/02/sinead-oconnor-miley-cyrus-open-letter/  Sinead later felt that she had been exploited by men who were making much more money than she  was — and pimped, essentially.  

Will the younger woman listen?  Probably not.  The young usually don’t.

Does that mean she’s a bad person?  

So quick the call that she is “trash” or a “slut.”  

This issue has been discussed in the press, the concept of slut shaming.
http://t.co/lvndE5Tqay 
http://t.co/BBbYBapZa6  

Women’s cruelty to each other is a huge feminist issue.  It forces women into the arms of men rather than allowing us to unite together for our common good.  

Men call them cat fights.  Men fear groups of women because of this cruel behavior and shut women out of positions of power and influence to avoid having to deal with the phenomenon.  Our emotional reactions to each other give men power over us, relegate us to second class citizens. 

I would submit that we must use our enlarged brains to overcome the base instinct to scratch each others’ eyes out.  That instinct is our downfall, our greatest weakness, the bars to our prison.

=============

Now, on to Josh.  

Who did we think he was?  Why would anyone be disappointed?

Let’s see,  He’s slender, awkward, nerdy, musical, shy, deferential, considerate.  He speaks in a high voice, even tho his singing voice is deep.  It’s easy to think he might be asexual or gay.  Even though he’s made pretty clear that he’s a horny, straight guy, we might not have entirely believed him.

Why do we want him to be asexual or gay? 

That leads to the question of who we are.

Let me speculate.  As women approaching or in menopause, has sex become more difficult, physically? Do we long for someone who wants and needs us, but doesn’t need to do that?  Have we lost someone who did love and need us, and Josh, understanding us by singing TWYA, seemed to step into the void?  

What was it about his voice that drew us?  Wasn’t it at least partly that overpowering emotion of miserable longing?  Did we hope that somehow he could produce that sound we craved, that sound of someone who wanted and needed us, without actually having a strong sex drive?

Yet we watch Josh perform, and he sometimes becomes aroused as he sings.  The iheart radio concert in 2012 was a notable example.  I was mesmerized watching that happen, but equally mesmerized by the way his voice got even more beautiful when he was aroused — when he sang “She Came Through the Fair” like that.  The passion really came through.

Doesn’t the particular intonation of his voice somehow fulfill a subliminal craving for the man who wants me so much?  

Isn’t it impossible that he could produce that sound without actually being a really horny guy?

So there are these rumors of him being a Lothario.  I don’t know if he is or not, but, if he is, should we be surprised?  Wasn’t it that very quality his voice that drew us to him?  Isn’t it hypocritical to condemn him for the very thing that is his genius -- the ability to desire so strongly?

************

Addendum:

Now look here, Lady Gaga is doing a ceremony of commitment with Taylor Kinney


Here is a person who was doing public nudity, drugs, declaring herself to be bi, etc.  Now, a bit older and more mature, she's doing an album with Tony Bennet and having a ceremony of commitment with a straight man.

This goes to show how we shouldn't judge people, including Kat and Josh, based on how they were when they were younger.  People mature and change, sometimes for the better -- sometimes not.




Sunday, October 12, 2014

memorializing tweets between Josh & Kat & others

I updated this blog several times after starting it.  You can see each new update as headed by some asterisks

***************

Josh has been flirting with young female actresses on twitter for a long time.  I've tended to ignore it, but I'm memorializing this set of interchanges right now, because it looks like it might have developed into something.  First, the expanded conversation view, then just Joshes tweets to her.













Recent appearance together http://t.co/zjKVry9TAh (amazing number of flashes)

**********************

Just for contrast, here's some tweets with another young performer





He actually tweeted this performer more than Kat, but there's not a video of them together, at least I don't know of one, but they tweeted back and forth enough that twitter apparently started behaving oddly with respect to them




****************

Now everyone is getting all excited about Josh appearing with Kat.  He's suddenly the featured item on Yahoo!


But let us not forget that only a few days ago he was photographed at another charity event with former girlfriend, January Jones


This photo is interesting in that he appears with January Jones in a photo with Brad Paisley &  Brad's wife, which makes them look like 2 couples.

**********************

Here's another person who Josh has been tweeting along with some of her most recent tweets.








*******************

Kat is rumored to be engaged to her boyfriend


who is reported to be Nick Zano


********************

Now, I can't say what is true here.  I am only remembering my impression, from when I was at the Americans for the Arts Awards in 2012, where Josh was honored.  After that event, I came away with the impression that Josh had engaged decoys, possibly even paid them, to distract us from who he was really with.  That's what I believed at the time.  Again, I can't say what is true.

That makes me suspicious that some or all of these women could be decoys again, but who knows?

********************

Here's someone else he tweeted a lot.  She uses her name now, Natalie Mooney, but she used to be Hot Mini Donuts and her twitter handle used to be diaper_wolf.  Josh apparently met her while touring in New Zealand.







I never used to take these extended twitter exchanges very seriously.  I thought these women were all decoys, because of my experience in 2012, but now I wonder whether he wasn't dating all of them.

************

Well here's the link with actual footage of him calling Kat his girlfriend


***************

Addendum 10/20/14

Josh himself mentioned another woman he's been tweeting with













Thursday, October 9, 2014

NY Philharmonic 10/1/14

I went to my first concert of my new New York Philharmonic subscription. I had to get this subscription in order to see the concert on 9/17 that Josh Groban was in. 

That was a good concert, btw. I actually tried to record it, but I have a new recorder that I don't know fully how to operate and I somehow pushed the wrong buttons at the wrong time and got nothing. I’m glad someone else recorded it, but I’m still hoping for a DVD.  I haven’t blogged about it for personal reasons.

In any case, buying the subscription was a bit like taking cod liver oil for me. My history is that classical music gives me narcolepsy. Josh's music is different. It has the aspects of classical music that I like, without putting me to sleep.

I haven't quite figured out what puts me to sleep, whether it's certain chord progressions; or musicians who play technically correctly, but without passion; or whether there's something a bit muddy and confused about the conducting that makes the sound blurry and therefore exhausting; or whether there's something about the ventilation that allows too much carbon dioxide to accumulate.  Whatever the cause, I find the experience of struggling to stay awake in the face of narcolepsy unpleasant and sleeping in a concert embarrassing.

Nevertheless, I did notice something on 9/17 that piqued my interest.  The violins seemed to sound different from other orchestra concerts I've been to.  They had a clear, clean sound that I hadn’t heard before.  Now it could be that my hearing is different, but maybe not.  I was happy, tho, because that clean, clear sound was NOT putting me to sleep.

On 9/17 I was in the first tier, but far from the stage in the center back.  The sound there is good, but you can’t see much.  On 10/1, I was in the third tier, but very close to the stage.  This is a partially obscured view seat and you have to stand up and lean over the railing to see stage left, but I could see the violinists very well. 

I immediately noticed that maybe half of them were young Asian women.  I was imagining a bunch of little girls all getting put into Suzuki violin training at age 3.  When I looked around the rest of the orchestra, most of the people were white and often middle aged.  But in the violins there was this large number of young, Asian women. 

I feel that we can really hear the results now of all that early training.  This orchestra totally does not sound the way orchestras used to sound, or at least the way I remember.  It’s a big improvement as far as I’m concerned.  I was a very happy camper in this concert.

Now those of you have read this blog will know that that is not my usual case.  I am often discontent with sound quality issues in concerts.  This was unusual — and welcome.

Also the ventilation was excellent, so there was no issue of carbon dioxide buildup.

Because I was a new subscriber there was a personal letter to me, taped to my seat, from one of the violinists.  It asked me to wave to her, but she never looked up to where I was siting, so I couldn’t.  I did get out my binoculars to find her, so I would know who she was. 

I didn’t rush out to the stage door after the performance to find her, but I may write her a letter.

They also had a representative from the NY Philharmonic come and greet me personally.  I told her I want to hear Lucia Micarelli live before I die and that I’ve had cancer and don’t know how long I have to live.  She wrote down the name and said she would look into it.  She also gave me a nylon shopping bag that collapses into a carrying case and that says NY Philharmonic.

The composer was Nielson.  I hope I'm spelling that right.  This gentleman lived in the late 19th and early 20th century.  The music was what one would call modern classical, with a lot of what one might call experimental sounds.  

They were passing out buttons that said “I <3 Nielson.”  I took one.  I don’t know when I might wear it, but I did love it.  It was fun, never boring.

And the sound — to die for — so wonderful.

Sadly, the place was half empty, especially the third tier.  It was so empty that there was no line at the women’s restroom at intermission on the top floor. That’s really saying something.

That’s really sad.  The New York Philharmonic is now *so* much better than any other orchestra I’ve ever heard — thanks, I think, to all those Asian tiger moms who made their little girls study violin starting at age 3.

Sadly, too, there weren’t enough people in the audience to compel an encore, even tho those who were there were very enthusiastic.

I started out feeling like this was cod liver oil, but they won me over.  Now I’m really looking forward to going again.

So go!  Go to the New York Philharmonic!  It’s not what you expect, or at least it wasn’t what I expected.



Tuesday, September 30, 2014

The amazing tenacity of the Josh hagiographers

Oh, the amazing extent to which some Grobanites cannot tolerate for people to say anything other than hagiography to Josh continues!  Tweet images below in reverse chronological order

My notifications:



My timeline









Monday, September 29, 2014

More about the profanity tweets

So  I wanted to add the new messages to the previous blog, but I got confused looking through it, so I'm starting over here.  I'm going to have to look through the tweets below again, to see if I can make it less confusing.  It's so hard to capture conversations on twitter.

The conversations memorialized in these screen images were part of threads that were occurring partly simultaneously and it's hard to sort it all out.  When I try to pull up a conversation thread, the thoughts don't appear any more sequentially than they do on the timelines.

So I am just going to write about what all this is bringing up for me.

In my personal story, there is this history that I was inspired to study improv comedy after watching Josh co-hosting Live ! with Kelly.  I found his interactions with her to be positively delightful.  I wanted to learn how to do that.

When I got to improv comedy school, I seldom saw what I had seen between Josh and Kelly.  Instead, I saw a lot of crudeness -- and a lot of self-righteousness about being crude.  People do this, because they think it's funny.  I don't find it funny.  In fact, I'm finding the constant vulgarity, and notably the profanity, tho not only the profanity, is feeling more and more like a continual verbal sexual assault.

People who behave this way feel that they are rebels, rebelling against some kind of authority figure.  But, for me, they are the authority figures and I am the rebel.  I do not want to be bullied into behavior that would seem like selling out to me.

Most of these people are younger than I.  Josh's age, or younger.  Yet, even tho I am 57, they have mostly been studying comedy and performance longer than I have, so I am the new kid on the block.  And I'm feeling frustrated and put upon by them.

So that is the backdrop from my point of view behind my interaction with Josh.

When I first started out being a Grobanite, I thought that Josh must be very like me.  Like me, he had older parents, father with Jewish ancestry, mother with Protestant ancestry, and raised Episcopalian.  I thought that I liked his music, because we had this common cultural background.

Since being a Grobanite, I've found that lots of different people like Josh's music.  Moreover, I've found that his growing up in a public school in Los Angeles was quite different from me growing up in a midwestern university town and later a suburb of San Francisco 25 years earlier.  He has an entirely different vocabulary from mine, not just in the area of profanity, but also in many other respects.  I often have to run to the Urban Slang Dictionary website to understand what he is saying.

I had assumed he must have put some effort into learning urban slang to sound cool and that he must really have learned to speak the same English I had learned to speak.  But I realize now that his speaking urban slang is not an affectation.  He truly speaks a different language from me, at least in part.

Profanity is part of this.  I have noticed in my improv comedy school that these younger urban people seem to use the "f" word in virtually every sentence, sometimes several times in the same sentence.  In fact, they are using this word in place of "um."  They are educated enough to know that if they say "um" constantly they will sound stupid.  They suppose that if they say the "f" word, instead of "um," they don't sound stupid.

In fact it's the same thing.

For me, though, this constant use of the "f" word feels like a continual verbal sexual assault.   I feel traumatized by that.

I do not want to enter into Stockholm syndrome and start justifying the behavior of the people who are behaving in a manner I find painful.

Maybe some people in this conversation who just sound like they're lecturing Josh on his language are feeling what I'm feeling.  That this language is painful for them to listen to -- that it feels attacking and harassing.

Unfortunately, tho, when they phrase this as if it were merely an etiquette lecture, they bring out the etiquette nerds who feel that it is rude to criticize others, especially when the criticism seems to lack substance.

Of course, this ignores the fact that the self-righteous etiquette nerds are themselves criticizing the people who criticized Josh's language.  Apparently, it's ok to criticize other fans, but not ok to criticize Josh.

My experience is that Josh is open to meaningful dialog on all reasonable subjects.

My impression is that many people, like myself, grew up in dysfunctional families where criticizing the authority figure resulted in harsh treatment, or where heated dialog was punished.  As a result, they feel that criticism of Josh must be silenced.

Josh, on the other hand, does not appear to have grown up in a dysfunctional family like that and does not appear to approve of group efforts to silence critics.  I applaud that in him.

I have pointed out to Josh, and I hope he remembers, that I love him and want him to be the best person he can be -- and that I feel that his impressions of things can be tinged by the worship of sycophantic fans -- so I feel that the best way I can be helpful to him is to point out things as I see them.

I believe that we each have a responsibility to speak our own truths.

OK, now for a memorialization of the tweet images, below.  There may be some tweets on the previous blog that aren't below.  This might be because they were deleted, or it might be due to the mysteries of cyberspace.  I would encourage the interested reader to look at the immediately previous issue of this blog, where there are also tweet images.

First, my timeline:












Then my notifications













More notifications




More of my timeline

------------------------------

It's still happening